WOW,,,Read this Oregonian Article:
Beaverton News, Breaking News, Business, Portland »
Majority of Beaverton City Council may support vote on baseball deal
By Brad Schmidt, The Oregonian
October 27, 2009, 7:30PM
BEAVERTON -- Any deal with Portland Beavers owner Merritt Paulson may be decided by Beaverton voters even without a signature effort by citizens.
A majority of the Beaverton City Council now says it supports referring to voters a $59 million baseball proposal, although timing for an election is uncertain. Bringing it to citizens may not be an issue, however, if the city is unable to secure a site for the stadium.
City leaders had pegged Tuesday as an informal deadline to recommend a ballpark location but say they need more time. Officials are now targeting Nov. 16 but say it might not happen by then, either.
More
Read earlier stories about Beaverton and the Portland Beavers."It's a reality check," Mayor Denny Doyle acknowledged Tuesday, noting that the process is more complicated than he anticipated. "It's difficult to assemble land."
Beaverton's inability to identify a site is delaying a project under a tight but apparently flexible timeline. The city and Paulson had hoped to reach a final development agreement by Dec. 15 and begin construction Feb. 15. But Paulson this week said stadium construction needs to begin no later than June, a schedule that would require a temporary home field for the first part of the 2011 season.
"Having a temporary place for a few months would not be a big deal," Paulson said.
There are "a number of options both locally and in other states," Paulson added, but he has not approached the Pacific Coast League about any of them.
"We haven't made a decision on what other solutions would be viable," Paulson said. "We don't want to have to do that."
Beaverton continues to focus on two potential stadium locations, Doyle said, which are being reviewed by city staff and Paulson's business team. Doyle and City Council President Bruce Dalrymple refused to disclose those locations.
"I'm not willing to share that information yet," said Dalrymple, who is part of the city's negotiating team. "But we're narrowing our focus."
As the city and Paulson work to find a potential place for the stadium, the larger issue of taxpayer funding remains contentious.
The proposed deal includes $9 million upfront from Paulson and annual rent and ticket tax payments for 25 years. The city would issue revenue bonds of about $50 million, to be repaid by citizens through higher property and utility taxes.
One group, Let Our Voters Vote, has vowed to collect signatures and force a vote if city leaders don't call for an election. Two dozen people testified Monday at a council meeting that they either oppose the ballpark or want to vote.
It appears there's political support to make that happen.
Councilors Cathy Stanton and Betty Bode have been calling for an election. Councilor Marc San Soucie also is now in favor of a public vote, according to e-mails provided by the city.
San Soucie told two residents in e-mails Oct. 20 that he is "not at all against a public vote." Then in three e-mails dated Oct. 23 or later, he wrote, "I will support referring (the issue) to the voters."
San Soucie did not return messages seeking comment.
Stanton said she is frustrated by the slow pace and lack of information coming from the city. Three months after Beaverton began serious negotiations with Paulson, Stanton said she's still waiting to discuss whether a baseball stadium is wise.
The long-time councilor said she's certain of at least one worthy investment, however.
"If it costs us $50,000 to hold an election," Stanton said, "that's money well spent."
-- Mark Larabee of The Oregonian staff contributed to this report.
-- Brad Schmidt
Let Our Voters Vote: On the Proposed Beaverton Baseball Stadium Issue
Wednesday October 28, 2009:
Please continue to write letters to the editor, send emails and show up to gatherings. This is a protracted effort and we will not prevail in our efforts for a public vote unless we keep up the pressure. The proponents must be made to realize that there will be a political cost to them.
We are improving the website very soon...please keep checking in.
LOVV is making progress! The Citizens and Taxpayers of Beaverton will be heard!!
Please read the following broadcast from New York City re Yankees Stadium:
Main Street NYC Returns to 161st Street in The Bronx
by Ailsa Chang
Download MP3 | Embed HTML
NEW YORK, NY October 28, 2009 —The first World Series in the new Yankee Stadium begins today. In the third part of our Main Street series, WNYC returns to the shopkeepers on 161st in the Bronx.
They’ve seen their businesses suffer in the shadow of the new stadium, and the playoffs didn’t improve matters much. Many of these shops expected to do better with the new stadium. But WNYC’s Ailsa Chang takes a look at how the new Yankee Stadium is getting Yankee fans to spend more money inside rather than outside the ballpark.
REPORTER: Eddie Morrison has been coming to Yankee Stadium for 30 years, but right now, he’s chomping on the fanciest nachos he’s ever bought at a game. He’s sitting next to Gate 6, in the brand new Hard Rock Café.
MORRISON: It should say THE BRONX Hard Rock Café, not just the Hard Rock Café. Because this is the Boogie Down Bronx, so you gotta show respect.
REPORTER: It may be the Bronx, but those nachos just set him back 13 dollars.
MORRISON: That’s just a part of the tradition. You have to uphold the tradition of buying very expensive food at the ballpark.
REPORTER: And there are more than a hundred separate spots in this stadium where you can spend lots of money to uphold that tradition. They’re mostly big chains – like Nathan’s hotdogs, Johnny Rockets and Carvel Ice Cream. Yankee fan George Figueroa says he forgets he’s at a ballpark.
FIGUEROA: You walk around and it’s like you not even in a game. You walk around and it’s like you in a mall. You have whole bunch of stuff you could do. You can buy food, you can buy merchandise – whatever. It, like, takes you away from reality. That’s a good thing. I mean, we don’t have that in the Bronx. We don’t have a big mall to walk around, so this is our mall right now.
REPORTER: But that’s the problem. Businesses just a couple blocks down 161st street didn’t think they’d be competing against a new mega-mall. Abdul Traore is managing a near-empty store called Jeans Plus. It sells Yankee souvenirs – many of them identical to the ones sold at the stadium, but about 30 percent cheaper. Traore’s been sitting on a stool by the door during the playoffs, as if waiting for customers to come in.
TRAORE: This playoff is different. Totally different. Like Saturday, I stay here until two o’clock in the morning – from the time the game start until two o’clock in the morning. I don’t even make thousand dollars.
REPORTER: Traore says in the days of the old stadium, he would make about five thousand dollars on a typical game night. His business is down 60 percent right now. And he says it’s not just the recession – it’s the new stadium. Fewer shoppers walk down 161st Street these days. For a lot of reasons. The new Metro-North station spits people right into the stadium. Fans who drive to games don’t park further down 161st and walk up anymore – they have new garages right by the complex. And the new ballpark has 4000 fewer seats. That’s a lot less people over 82 home games.
KATSIHTIS: I think the neighborhood in general has lowered its expectations.
REPORTER: Peter Katsihtis is the manager of the Crown Donuts Diner, just two blocks from Yankee Stadium. He says business picked up a little during the playoffs, but they’re still dragging compared to past seasons.
KATSIHTIS: I think everyone’s scaling back and realizing, it is what it is. This is the new world we live in, and everyone’s making the best of it.
REPORTER: Katsihtis says they haven’t had to let anyone go, but some waitresses have seen their tips cut in half. He says he and other restaurant owners counted on the new stadium to bring in new, bigger crowds. But ironically, this year, he says his business relies more than ever on regulars – not game-goers.
KATSIHTIS: Like my brother puts it best: Our regulars will fill the place up. It’s the street traffic that gave us that overflow.
REPORTER: But why would any of the local businesses have expected more overflow with the new stadium – a stadium with more restaurants, more bars and more shops than the old one? That’s what has economists scratching their heads.
NOLL: The whole point of a modern athletic facility – whether it’s an arena for hockey and basketball or a stadium for football or baseball – is to get all of the money to be spent inside the stadium.
REPORTER: Economist Roger Noll at Stanford University has looked at every stadium built in the last 20 years. In each case, he wanted to find out whether the new stadium gave a real, substantive boost to neighborhood businesses. The answer? Not a single one did. In fact, many local stores ended up doing a lot worse.
NOLL: For some reason in the last 20 years, people have decided that, as a political matter, it makes sense to try to sell new sports facilities not as entertainment and recreation and fun, that this is something that’s nice for a community to have, but instead, as a way to try to make money for an entire city, and that’s just completely wrong.
REPORTER: According to the New York City Independent Budget Office, the city forked over more than $360 million in tax exemptions and subsidies to help pay for the stadium. Much of the rationale was that the new ballpark would be good for the city’s economy. But Noll says local businesses won’t see returns on that investment. The fundamental business model for the modern stadium is to keep shoppers inside its walls. In fact, he says, the fastest-growing source of revenue in professional sports is stadium sales – food, alcohol, clothing.
NOLL: If you compare the size of old parks versus new parks, the new ones are much bigger than the old ones. The size of the baseball field is still the same. The number of seats is, if anything, smaller. But the footprint of the entire facility is usually three or four times as big as a baseball park would have been 40 or 50 years ago. The difference is putting all this concession activity into the new facility.
REPORTER: The Yankees declined to say how much they’re making from sales in the new stadium. Yankee president Randy Levine promised before the ballpark was built that no businesses would be displaced. Noll, however, says some of the shops on 161st Street that are competing directly with stadium stores are toast.
REPORTER: But there are some places Yankee fans say are immune from shutting down, no matter how bad business gets. Joe Bastone has owned Yankee Tavern for 25 years and says this is one of the worst years he’s seen. Business was down 75 percent on Opening Day. Now, it’s off by 20 percent. But he says, this is a place that’s survived since 1923, where Babe Ruth used to buy rounds of drinks for everyone. So, he isn’t scared of a new stadium.
BASTONE: There’s history here. There’s no history in the new Yankee Stadium. They’re going to have to start from scratch. Babe Ruth was here, Joe DiMaggio, Mickey Mantel. All the old Hall of Famers used to come in here. No other establishment can say that. That’s history.
REPORTER: Meanwhile, the city says it wants to help prop up the less resilient businesses in the area. So here’s what they’re doing – they’re sending kids to Yankee home games wearing bright white T-shirts that say “161st Street Business Improvement District.” That’s the name of the city’s economic development program for the area. For WNYC, I’m Ailsa Chang.
